The Supreme Court Struck Down The Mccain Feingold Act

The demons of a misinterpreted judicial review have corrupted the legislature, the courts, and our political process. In 2010, the Supreme Court struck down the McCain-Feingold Act as unconstitutional. The landmark Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission decision ruled that political spending is a form of free speech and corporations have license to contribute exorbitant amounts to politicians. Citizens United ensures denies the voices of citizens as representatives are beholden to outside interests rather than their constituency. I, Justice John B. Gibson, hold that the power of judicial review is too widely interpreted and, to keep government officials accountable, must be vested in the masses to rediscover some twinge of our once budding representative democracy. The Supreme Court often oversteps its perceived legal sovereignty when using judicial review. Article III of the Constitution solely vests the courts the â€Å"judicial power of the United States† never me ntioning the power of judicial review. The judiciary’s duty, according to the law of the land, is â€Å"to interpret the laws, not scan the authority of the lawgiver† (Gibson, J.). The judiciary has not followed a strict interpretation of the constitution; rather, it has encroached on the power of the legislative branch and the sanctity of the separation of powers. If the Constitution â€Å"were to come into collision with an act of the legislature† (Gibson, J.), the Constitution would take precedent, but it isShow MoreRelatedUnited V. Fec : The Rise Of The Super Pac1049 Words   |  5 PagesUnited v. FEC was a landmark court case that dealt with regulations on campaign financing from corporations, labor unions, and other associations. It started when Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization, attempted to broadcast a film criticizing Hillary Clinton shortly before the Democratic primaries in which she was running for president (Oyez, 2009). At th e time, this went against the McCain-Feingold Act, or the BCRA (Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act), which prohibited corporationsRead MoreCampaign Finance Reform Essay3020 Words   |  13 PagesCampaign Act (FECA) of 1971 together with the 1971 Revenue Act initiated fundamental changes in Federal campaign finance laws. The FECA, effective April 7, 1972, not only required full reporting of campaign contributions and expenditures, but also limited spending on media advertisements, which were later repealed (Federal Election Commission, 2006). The people were not completely satisfied with the FECA of 1971. In 1974 the FECA Act was amended. Because of campaign abuse, congress amended the act to limitRead MorePro Quo Corruption : Political Institutions And Agencies1685 Words   |  7 Pageshaving a more difficult time to addressing campaign finance regulations; thus, exposing loopholes and flaws in the system. Some of these lawsuits have been brought to the courts to dispute campaign regu lations on a basis of constitutionality, such as infringing on 1st and 14th Amendment rights. This unfortunately allows the Supreme Court and its jurisprudence to try and make decisions based on their own interpretations regarding campaign finance. The amount of money that is dumped into campaigns todayRead MoreHistory Of The Campaign Finance1464 Words   |  6 Pagesthe first federal regulation regarding campaign finance. In 1907, there was the Tillman Act, which prohibits corporations and national banks from contributing money directly to presidential or congressional campaigns. The law, which only applies to general elections, was widely flouted through loopholes. It was the first law to attempt to regulate federal campaigns. However, weak enforcement mechanisms made the Act ineffective. Disclosure requirements and spending limits for House and Senate candidatesRead MoreThe First Step Towards Lasting Campaign Finance Reform2697 Words   |  11 Pagesexpedient way to prevent undue influence while preserving the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution? Of particular focus recently is the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, for which The Supreme Court heard oral argument on March 24, 2009 and the subsequent 9-0 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission in March 26, 2010 case. Together these two precedent-setting cases are credited with establishing theRead MoreCampaign Finance Reform: The History, Present, and Future Essay1810 Words   |  8 Pages(Fuller). In 1907, the Tillman Act was passed. This act prohibits corporations and national banks from contributing money directly to presidential or congressional campaigns. This law only applied to general elections and was ineffective due to loopholes (Rowan). The Federal Corrupt Practices Act was passed in 1910. It requires House candidates to disclose campaign spending and the source of all campaign contributions. This Act was later amended in 1911 to make the act require that Senate candidatesRead MoreVoting The Voting Rights Act1446 Words   |  6 Pagesoffice. Over the course of American government, the most recent changes and influences to the electorate include the passage of the Voting Rights Act, as well as the recent Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder. For example, the video Fight for the Right to Vote, features one experts explaining that prior to the passage of the Voting Rights Act, around half of the eligible voters were unable to vote, thanks to the systematic repression (CITATION). Poll taxes, literacy tests, and inaccurateRead MoreThe Issue Of Gay Marriage4005 Words   |  17 Pageschapter five. Lambda Legal Defense eve talks about how they will enforce gay marriage through the manipulation of the courts. The whole trend started in 1996 in Hawaii, with a ruling there saying theres no reason to ban gay civil marriages. The biggest problem, is that this is not the job of the Supreme Court Justices to decide, but elected representatives. In 20 years, the Supreme court has decided in two cases addressing constitutionality of state sodomy in Bowers v. Hardwick and Lawrence v. TexasRead MoreEssay on The Power of Money in Campaign Finance2723 Words   |  11 PagesIt may seem that with the Buckley decision, soft money and PACs the hope for reform has been lost, however there is still hope. The Supreme Court upheld the voluntary public financing of presidential election, which was considered a great step forward because taking public funds requires the candidate to limit their spending on the federal level. There is also the â€Å"hard money† in political campaigns, which is strictly regulated by law through the Federal Election Commission. Hard money is the contrast